Notes on a talk by John Lato of Tsuru Capital at Iowa Code Camp.
Coursera - financial modeling, etc. courses are available
Derivatives market is huge. (A quadrillion dollars!)
Create a model for the prices structure and derive a formula from the model.
Example: Black-Scholes Option Model - statistical volatility is the main variable, along with underlying price and time to maturity
Delta - underlying, Vega - volatility, Theta - time (The Greeks) (actually equations)
Wikipedia & Investipedia have articles on this.
Modeling is very math-y.
Algo Trading: Reality
- Buggy 3rd party code
- Out of spec implementations
Can measure success: Are we making money?
1-2 GB/day for a small subset of the orderbook from the MarketFeed.
Knight Capital SEC article - how software deployment issues can cost your business money.
How Tsuru uses Haskell
- Type system
- Concurrency model
- Foreign interface
The Haskell Kool-Aid: If it compiles, it works! (Mostly true.)
Newtypes are "free," apply liberally. (Similar to units of measure in F#.)
This way you don't apply the wrong function to a price, etc.
Way to preserve invariants (can include constraints).
Coming to a strongly-typed functional language from a dynamic language is hard.
You have data, and you have functions. Model your data accurately.
If you have a Maybe Int, you can only use it with things that work with Maybe.
Rather than throwing exceptions, you create types that preserve invariants.
Functions that work with, for instance, a list of any type
Can't alter your data, as they have no interface to interact with it
Similar to generics in C#/Java
Example: many :: Parser a -> Parser [a]
(a is generic)
You can do a lot of this stuff in C# now, but it gets very verbose.
Type inference may infer a type more general than you thought, in which case you get code for free! (In functional languages.)
(In Haskell, it's considered good practice to write type signatures, at least for top-level functions.)
Immutable-by-default and lack of side effects are a big win
Some challenges remain (e.g. no mechanism for thread priority)
In F#, considered good practice to make a method pure unless good reason
Side effects are "Spooky action at a distance"
In Haskell, if something doesn't have IO (monad) in the signature, it doesn't do I/O.
Similar functionality to async/await. In functional languages, typically the syntax is very clean.
hackage.haskell.org - lots of code examples
ghc - compiler most people use - offers REPL, includes mem/perf profiler
Cabal - build system
In Haskell, deep debugging can be hard. Traditional stack traces are tricky.
Have both unit tests and functional tests. (HUnit)
QuickCheck - Haskell (and more?) testing tool - generates random input
Checks results - good for catching corner cases
Also use a simulator in place of exchange, playing back feeds, etc.