Notes on a talk by Tim Gifford at Iowa Code Camp.
CelebrityAgilist.com - GitHub community
Agile Manifesto - no processes are listed.
See also the related 12 principles.
SAFe Agile process (new RUP?) - speaker has seen companies turn the PSI's from that into little waterfalls - easy to lose track of what the customer values
Incremental - you don't see the whole picture until everything is done
Iterative - see the picture, but it starts out fuzzy
(Like interleaved graphics downloading)
User Story Maps - read more on this!
Weinberg's Law of Raspberry Jam - the wider you spread it, the thinner it gets (poor understanding)
Testing Boundaries problem
3 code paths with 10 paths each - need 1,000 end-to-end tests
If we get a defect in one code path, 100 tests fail.
Spend all your time fixing broken tests.
10/10/10 unit tests + 200 integration tests + 1 end-to-end = 230 tests
Only 22 or so fail if there's a defect.
(Same combinatorial problem Mark Seemann talks about on Pluralsight.)
Large problems need leadership & courage.
More people => fewer questions => less learning
Interpersonal issues - why not split them up on clique boundaries?
Responsibility is spread out.
Small Feature Teams
Top-to-bottom, delivering customer value.
More opportunities for leadership roles.
He's using Feature Toggles.
He's very much in favor of it, but there's a downside.
You need to make sure you're truly releasing the software, not just delivering with features turned off.
It's important to still have a release plan.
Give pilot teams learning time - an extra point per story, etc.
You don't start out with TDD/BDD/ATDD at full velocity.
You cannot teach craftsmanship. Knowledge does not change behavior.
(There are marriage counselors who are divorced.)
"It's always a people problem" - Weinberg's 2nd Law of Consulting
(Secrets of Consulting is Weinberg's book)
Drowning in Defects
Agile practices can help with new defects - but what about legacy?
Defect age ranged from 2 hours to 2 years on one of his projects.
The variability resulted in angry customers.
What if we do defects in the order in which they were received? FIFO?
What about the old ones? Ignore them - if they're important, they'll be reported again.
Prioritization can be waste.
Capacity needs to align with demand - the business needs to step in if the bug requests are overwhelming the developers (more hires or stop reporting bugs until developers catch up).
Leadership doesn't come from authority. If you see a problem, fix it.
Why do we let defects accumulate?
In order to run fast, you need to run clean.
Don't start coding until you have a Given-When-Then scenario.